friday night, 3rd of december was the first time for me to follow the chinese cell group, and it was nice, talking in chinese to people you hardly know. well, i know some of them because they knew my brother. anyway, i came back last night and guess what?! i lost khelex's pen and now i feel really guilty all over again, i went out early this morning to look for it but i couldn't find it, what am i going to do?! i'm always menghilangkan people's stuff! hmm.............
Arasaratnam and Doerfel's (2005) study on defining intercultural communicative competence (ICC) may be dated, but I believe their discussions are very relevant to the current situation of ICC. Their study aimed to define ICC from a grounded exploratory approach. Their reasoning behind this is because of the subjective understanding of what intercultural is, and what competence is. Communication, from an intercultural perspective, is typified as spoken discourse. To come to a definition of ICC, the study interviewed a group of international and local students studying in an American university. The students were asked what they thought ICC is, and what they thought are key components of a person who is interculturally competent. Though responses were diverse, a common thread was induced. But would this common thread still be applicable to different cultural contexts? Probably from a qualitative perspective it would be, but perhaps not if viewed wit...
Comments