i just got back from bangkok yesterday, syok benar!!!!!!!!!!! i wen there on thursday and on friday, we brought lona and the rest of the sabahans to MBK and went shopping, finished a whole lot of my money buying stuff for my family! then on saturday, went to church, but i ended up going out to eat with juji, oscar, and ervin. then after church, we went shopping again and in the evening, after the wedding rehearsal, we went for dinner and we had karaoke! i sang pretty boy by M2M! so bikin malu!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! anyway i had a great time, but probably would only go next semester! no money to go anymore.........
Arasaratnam and Doerfel's (2005) study on defining intercultural communicative competence (ICC) may be dated, but I believe their discussions are very relevant to the current situation of ICC. Their study aimed to define ICC from a grounded exploratory approach. Their reasoning behind this is because of the subjective understanding of what intercultural is, and what competence is. Communication, from an intercultural perspective, is typified as spoken discourse. To come to a definition of ICC, the study interviewed a group of international and local students studying in an American university. The students were asked what they thought ICC is, and what they thought are key components of a person who is interculturally competent. Though responses were diverse, a common thread was induced. But would this common thread still be applicable to different cultural contexts? Probably from a qualitative perspective it would be, but perhaps not if viewed wit...
Comments