this year was really a nice one, full of surprises. first me and my five other friends found out that we were selected for national service, which in turn gave me no time to finish up 2003 raintree. well, i was actually lazy to do it already because i've already graduated out from high school. then i am here in Mission college doing a BA in english, and i'm telling everyone that i still am not sure of my major! and here i am now, in my room, wearing my new boxer pants which i bought last week, as a symbol of celebration of the new year, 2005! yipieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Arasaratnam and Doerfel's (2005) study on defining intercultural communicative competence (ICC) may be dated, but I believe their discussions are very relevant to the current situation of ICC. Their study aimed to define ICC from a grounded exploratory approach. Their reasoning behind this is because of the subjective understanding of what intercultural is, and what competence is. Communication, from an intercultural perspective, is typified as spoken discourse. To come to a definition of ICC, the study interviewed a group of international and local students studying in an American university. The students were asked what they thought ICC is, and what they thought are key components of a person who is interculturally competent. Though responses were diverse, a common thread was induced. But would this common thread still be applicable to different cultural contexts? Probably from a qualitative perspective it would be, but perhaps not if viewed wit...
Comments