just got to the library! i had mee soup thailand for lunch, and i had a chocolate coated donut, with chocolate rice sprinkled on it, i had a scoop of chocolate ice cream with some of tina's left over coco crunch on it! hehehehehehehe, chocolate is so sedap! i got my good boy looks back, got rid of my long hair, so now, i look just like how i looked when i was studying back in sass! wanted to go do highlights, but i thought that my hair was too red to do highlights, so i guess i would have to wait until my dye is all gone, and i have my black hair again, then i'll go highlight! but manalah tau, datang my gila, i go dye hitam and then i go highlight tomorrow! i'll just wait and see, i got bored very fast! hehehehehehehe, i want new pictures to this blog lah, i wished i had phlog instead of blog, that's where i can publish picts right!? but anyways, [that's what my lab instructor likes to say..anyways......grossssssss(*O*)]
Arasaratnam and Doerfel's (2005) study on defining intercultural communicative competence (ICC) may be dated, but I believe their discussions are very relevant to the current situation of ICC. Their study aimed to define ICC from a grounded exploratory approach. Their reasoning behind this is because of the subjective understanding of what intercultural is, and what competence is. Communication, from an intercultural perspective, is typified as spoken discourse. To come to a definition of ICC, the study interviewed a group of international and local students studying in an American university. The students were asked what they thought ICC is, and what they thought are key components of a person who is interculturally competent. Though responses were diverse, a common thread was induced. But would this common thread still be applicable to different cultural contexts? Probably from a qualitative perspective it would be, but perhaps not if viewed wit...
Comments